One VERIFY engine. Every contract-driven decision at TRH.
Harsight VERIFY combines periodic-batch technology with HARS Advisors and hospital owners. It reconciles every agreement, invoice, claim, provider file, and obligation against contract terms — surfacing recoverable and avoidable dollars, readiness risk, and the decisions owners need to make. This tour walks the whole narrative for the fictional Texas Regional Hospital. Nothing here is real-time and nothing contains PHI.
How VERIFY works, everywhere
The same four steps power all seven modules. Learn it once; it reads the same in Revenue, Access, Workforce, and Compliance.
Pull terms, rates, deadlines, and obligations from agreements and periodic batch feeds.
Compare real activity — invoices, remittance, PSV results, attestations — against those terms.
Weight a transparent scorecard with honest coverage disclosure — never a black-box grade.
Route evidence-backed exceptions to owners with status, provenance, and a downloadable trail.
Seven stops, one story
Follow in order for the full investor narrative, or jump to any module. Each stop shows a live figure from this demo.
- 1AgreementsThe source of truth
Every module starts here — the contract register that defines the terms everything else is reconciled against.
Try: Open any agreement to see extracted terms, obligations, and amendments.
$51.2Mgoverned value - 2SpendAvoidable dollars
Invoice and contract exceptions — over-rate, duplicate, and off-contract spend caught against the agreement terms.
Try: Filter the exception worklist and open one for its full calculation.
$267Kavoidable exposure - 3VendorsTransparent scorecards
The shared scorecard engine — including provisional RCM claims accuracy with pending claims excluded from the denominator and full weight-coverage disclosure.
Try: Open TruBridge to see the RCM claims accuracy method note and pending exclusion.
Foundation-approvedscoring method - 4RevenueExpected vs. paid
Payer yield, underpayment and denial exposure, and a recovery worklist — each claim variance links back to its contract term and 835 evidence.
Try: Open a claim variance for the expected-vs-paid calculation and chronology.
$485Krecoverable (portfolio) - 5AccessEstimates & transparency
A good-faith patient estimate simulator (benefit parameters only, no PHI), CMS artifact readiness, and estimate-accuracy monitoring.
Try: Move the simulator sliders — the transparent step trace recomputes live. 1 artifact is stale.
75%estimate accuracy - 6WorkforceCredentialing readiness
Provider credentialing, enrollment, licensure, and OIG-LEIE/SAM exclusion screening — fully synthetic provider files, no real PII.
Try: Open a blocked file (1 billing-blocked) to see the PSV checklist and exclusion screen.
90avg readiness - 7ComplianceObligations & evidence
Regulatory filings, contractual obligations, attestation cycles, and audit findings — each with an owner, due date, and archived evidence.
Try: Open an overdue obligation, then follow its linked policy and agreement.
2overdue obligations
Why it compounds
Because every module reconciles against the same agreement register with the same transparent scoring, value compounds: a contract term surfaced in Agreements drives a Spend exception, a Revenue recovery, a Compliance obligation, and a Workforce enrollment check — all traceable to one source. For the competitive context behind this build, see the preserved readiness brief.